Events

International Network for Learning and Teaching Geography in Higher Education (INLT) Glasgow Workshop - 2004

(in association with LTSN-GEES and JGHE)

The University of Strathclyde Graduate School of Business Conference Centre

Glasgow, 21-23 August 2004

Contents


About this event

This workshop is being organised in association with the Journal of Geography in Higher Education (JGHE), the Learning and Teaching Support Network Subject Centre for Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences (LTSN-GEES) and the Higher Education Research Group of the Royal Geographical Society with the Institute of British Geographers.

It is a workshop with a difference in that it will involve discussions, writing and project planning stimulated by short outline papers (c2500 words) written in groups before the workshop. The pre-workshop papers can be found below and are for general discussion to begin towards the end of June.

Six topics will be discussed

to view or download a particular discussion paper in RTF, follow the "read paper" links below
to post or read comments on a particular discussion paper follow the "post or read comments" links below

  1. Fieldwork
  2. Problem based learning
  3. ICT, distance learning and the curriculum
  4. Enhancing employment, key skills and the curriculum
  5. Teaching for social transformation including diversity issues (e.g. race, disability)
  6. Linking teaching and research

If you would like any of the papers in a different format please contact Mike Sanders

The revised papers will be submitted to JGHE.

[ Top of Page ]

Group Project Plans

Problem-based learning

This project follows on from the group's paper produced for the INLT Glasgow workshop, 'Problem-based learning in geography: towards a critical assessment of its purposes, benefits and costs'.

The purpose of the project is to evaluate the benefits of PBL for geography through construction of an indicative inventory of how it is being adopted in the discipline in different parts of the world. The project will use a simple evaluation tool, directed to both students and instructors, and using the same set of questions for each group. The institutional context within which each application is occurring will be noted. A key element of the project will be to assess the often untested assumptions about PBL benefits that occur in the literature.

Ethics approval will be sought by Julie Trafford by Christmas 2004. A pilot study will be run by Eric Fournier and Sue Vajoczki in January and February 2005. Survey design will be finalised by the end of March 2005. Thereafter each group member will seek three PBL courses, curricula, or components to evaluate, with a deadline of December 2005.

Group members hope to reconvene at the National Council for Geographic Education, Birmingham, Alabama, in October 2005 in order to discuss results to date and consider how best to report these. The project will be finalised for reporting at the regional meeting of the IGU in Brisbane, Australia, in July 2006.

The outputs from the project will be:

Group members: Eric Pawson (Canterbury, co-ordinator); Eric Fournier (Samford); Martin Haigh (Oxford Brookes); Osvaldo Muniz (La Serena); Sue Vajoczki (McMaster); Julie Trafford (Auckland).

[ Top of Page ]

Future aims for the Teaching for social transformations group

The aims of the teaching for social transformation group over the coming year, or so, is to compile a portfolio of good teaching practice from fellow geography academics. This will be achieved through each group member interviewing a minimum of 3 colleagues through their networks, either face-to-face, over the telephone or a web interview. These different techniques are to enable more people to be interviewed from a greater number of international contacts. These interviews will form the basis of future work directions and an article for publication in JGHE.

[ Top of Page ]

Project outline: Geography Fieldwork: Student Voice Forum

Aim:

To explore international perspectives of student experience of fieldwork (towards evidence for effectiveness of fieldwork)

Methods:
1. Mechanisms for collecting student opinion

(NB it is recognised that different mechanisms will be appropriate in different institutions and for different student groups)

Group members intend to elicit responses by intergrating some evaluation of fieldwork into student assessment

Each group member will identify one or two opportunities for eliciting comments during the first year of the project. In addition each group member will aim to find two collaborators (hopefully drawing in wider international partners) from other institutions to gather similar data. The group members will wish to pilot the questions/method first before widening out to these potential partners.

2. Distilling comments and perceptions

It is recognised that it would not be appropriate or practical for student comments to be posted directly onto the web> some degree of tutor editing will be required to control both quality and amount of the comments that are posted.

Details of host for web site – possibilities of either Singapore or Liverpool Hope – another possibility might be GEES.

3. Interaction and feedback (student to student)

Once initials comments are posted, we aim to stimulate student reaction to the comments in order to gain deeper understanding and also to promote international discussion.

Issues / threads for student discussion and comment

These should be based around the paper themes i.e. student engagement, student learning, employability, skill development, recruitment / enjoyment / expectation.

However, different terminology must be used in asking the questions to students – this needs some careful thought and development. We do need a standard set of prompts / questions even thought they will be used in fairly diverse situations and ways.

We hope to have responses from students about different types of fieldwork – the dimensions identified include:

We also would be interested in both pre- and post-fieldwork perceptions.

Timescale

Aim to have output by 2006

Practical issues identified

David Higgitt to act as project coordinator.

Some issues with language with students from Finland and other potential partners

Group members to keep eyes open for possible funding opportunities or sources of support (e.g. research assistant, help with web page development) and circulate to group as appropriate.

Sally Edmonson to explore possible support from Herodot project.

[ Top of Page ]

The ICT group proposed to:

  1. Draft articulation agreements between two or more institutions for managing an internationalized course or curriculum via distance education
  2. Develop an outline of an "internationalized" course in teacher education, GIS, and/or cartography
  3. Conduct market research to assess costs, need, etc for an internationalized course program.

With regard to the second and third proposals, we plan to incorporate
findings from the AAG faculty survey that measures perceptions of the value
of internationalization and the extent geographers support global learning
outcomes in the undergraduate curriculum.

[ Top of Page ]

Final Workshop Programme

Saturday 21 August: Review

09.00-09.30 Registration and Coffee

09.30-10.00 Welcome, introductions and plan for the day - room 505

10.00-11.15 Groups review web summaries and responses; plan JGHE articles

11.15-11.45 Coffee

11.45-12.45 Groups present article plans (10 min) and receive feedback (10 min) (three groups together in two rooms)

12.45-13.45 Lunch

13:45-14.25 Discussion of common themes from article plans (Room 505)

14.25-15.00 Groups review feedback, delegate responsibilities and start revisions

15.00-15.30 Walk to Glasgow School of Art

15:30-16:15 Guided tour of the Glasgow School of Art (Rennie Mackintosh building) by student ambassador

16:30-17:30 Afternoon tea at the Willow Tea Rooms, in the private Rennie Mackintosh Room

17.30-19.30 Free time

19.30 Evening Dinner at Strathclyde Business School; bar open from 18.00

(NB: Social programme sponsored by JGHE)

Sunday 22 August: Planning

08.00-09.00 Breakfast

09.00-09.15 Introduction to the day Room 505

09.15-11.15 Group project planning (aims, methods, timetable)

11.15-11.45 Coffee

11.45-12.45 Groups present project plans (10 mins) and receive feedback (10 mins) (three groups together in two rooms)

12.25-13.45 Lunch

13.45-14.25 Discussion of common themes from project plans Room 505

14.25-15.00 Groups review feedback and delegate responsibilities for taking plans forward

15.00-15.30 Tea

15.30-16.15 Where next for the INLT? Room 505

16.15-17.00 Evaluation of workshop and process of collaborative writing and project planning Room 505

19.00-22.00 Drinks reception and formal conference dinner (Melville Room, Gilbert Scott Building, University of Glasgow)*

(NB: Dinner sponsored by LTSN-GEES, * transport provided)

Monday 23 August

07:30-09.00 Breakfast and depart

[ Top of Page ]

Delegate List and Group Details

Delegate Details
Name Surname Institution Distance Discussion Group
Steve Gaskin LTSN-GEES, UK Yes N/A
Mick Healey University of Gloucestershire, UK No N/A
Ruth Healey University of Sheffield, UK No N/A
Mike Sanders LTSN-GEES, UK Yes N/A
Barbara Gambini Universita di Urbino, Italy No employability
Sharon Gedye LTSN-GEES, UK distance employability
Artimus Keiffer Wittenburg University, USA No employability
Pauline Kneale University of Leeds, UK No employability
Paul Rooney Liverpool Hope University College, UK No employability
Barbara VanDrasek University of Minnesota, USA No employability
Sally Edmondson Liverpool Hope University College, UK No fieldwork
Derek France Chester College of HE, UK No fieldwork
Ian Fuller Massey University, New Zealand distance fieldwork
Ilkka Ratinen University of Jyvaskyla, Finland No fieldwork
Hilary Thomas University of Newport, UK distance fieldwork
David Higgitt University of Singapore, Singapore No fieldwork
Lex Chalmers Waikato University, New Zealand No ICT
David DiBiase The Pennsylvania State University, USA No ICT
Karl Donert Liverpool Hope University College, UK No ICT
Susan Hardwick University of Oregon, USA distance ICT
Mariyana Kostadinova Nikolova Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Bulgaria No ICT
John Lidstone Queensland University of Technology, Australia distance ICT
Michael Solem Association of American Geographers, USA No ICT
Richard Baker Australian National University, Australia No linking teaching & research
John Bradbeer University of Portsmouth, UK distance linking teaching & research
Alan Jenkins Oxford Brookes University, UK distance linking teaching & research
Richard Le Heron University of Auckland, New Zealand No linking teaching & research
Lindsey McEwen University of Gloucestershire, UK distance linking teaching & research
John McKendrick Glasgow Caledonian University, UK No linking teaching & research
Gabor Mezosi University of Szeged, Hungary No linking teaching & research
Eric Fournier Samford University, USA No PBL
Martin Haigh Oxford Brookes University, UK No PBL
Osvaldo Muniz Universidad de La Serena, Chile No PBL
Eric Pawson University of Canterbury, UK No PBL
Julie Trafford University of Auckland, New Zealand No PBL
Sue Vajoczki McMaster University Canada No PBL
Andrea Berardi The Open University, UK No social transformation
Brian Chalkley LTSN-GEES, UK No social transformation
Bill Chambers Liverpool Hope University College, UK No social transformation
Hans De Jong Hogeschool van Arnhem en Nijmegen, The Netherlands No social transformation
Janice Monk University of Arizona, USA No social transformation
Jodi Vender The Pennsylvania State University, USA distance social transformation
Jane Wellens University of Leicester, UK No social transformation
[ Top of Page ]

The Higher Education Academy Subject Centre for Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences,
Buckland House, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth, PL4 8AA
Email: info@gees.ac.uk Tel: ++44 1752 584529 Fax: ++44 1752 584880